Tag Archives: Brendan Barber

What Steve Webb must do now.

Well Mr Webb, you said it; I refer to your excellent talk at the IOD (16/10/12) First you said that you would legislate for “pot follows member” in 2014/15 .Then when asked what happens if a member transfers to a bad qualifying scheme, you … Continue reading

Posted in annuity, CDC, dc pensions, defined aspiration, Financial Education, Henry Tapper blog, Management, Payroll, pensions, Retirement, Treasury | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 20 Comments

The toxic transfer; be wary when aggregating pensions!

The DWP has published new statistics that support their contention that there is more economic value in the “pot follows member” model than the “aggregate to Supertrust” model. The NAPF have of course countered and have calculated that under the aggregator … Continue reading

Posted in annuity, auto-enrolment, dc pensions, defined aspiration, pensions | Tagged , , , , , , , | 14 Comments