American regulators- worried about what their insurance companies own to pay our wages in retirement

It is what we fear but dare not talk about because our insurance companies are increasingly owned by “their” insurance companies.

We have seen it happen with banks, we don’t want to see it happen in insurance. We don’t know if we have in FSCS the apparatus to keep “pension” like payments coming through “annuities“.

Asset managers have pitched this fast-growing corner of financial markets as more lucrative than traditional structured debt, while still winning pristine ratings from the big credit agencies. Life insurers, which are hungry for long-dated investments to meet their decades-long promises to policyholders, have been studying and investing in these new securitised debt deals as they look to bolster the returns they market on annuities they sell to retirees.

I know this may seem a long way away, but we thought that before the American Bear Sterns and then Lehman Brothers triggered a seismic problem for UK Banks.

The problem in 2008-9 was there was a conspiracy of silence from those who knew from lawyers to investment bankers the CDIs that brought us down were “magic”.

The talk of the main players sounds horribly familiar

So where’s the risk?

The risk is in what’s called “circularity”, what ordinary people call buying what you already buying leading to double counting.

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found on the Help FAQ on gift articles.
https://www.ft.com/content/4de8bfa8-9eb3-4d70-bd17-273a6834dd41?syn-25a6b1a6=1

In addition to concerns over transparency and interconnectedness, they also raised concerns not specific to the Apollo and KKR structures, the people added.

Regulators said that they had identified significant problems in insurers’ multi-asset investment vehicles related to whether the products can offer the returns they promise over the long term.

Regulators said some insurers have already bought investment products that create maturity mismatches, in which structures promise to pay returns over decades, but rely on underlying assets that mature years or decades beforehand. That has raised questions about whether companies will be able to source investments with similar levels of profitability in the future.

There is a sickeningly familiar ending if fears from American Regulators lead to failure. We remember the queues outside Northern Rock.


If you’ve read this far – hear is a footnote from Gordon Aitken – do you agree that annuities are invulnerable?

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to American regulators- worried about what their insurance companies own to pay our wages in retirement

  1. Tim Simpson says:

    Hello Henry,
    US Regulators sounding the alarm etc

    I think you are right to raise this warning given the facts regarding US firms raiding ours. Not being a subscriber to the FT I have been unable to read the other parts you are referring to.

    Unfortunately, unless I am mistaken, there has not been much formal comment recently regarding Just etc. With this in mind, I doubt that there will be much industry interest in what you are warning against above. After all, the firms involved will see that as ‘ethics’ which is not what the London Stock Exchange is about. Where a satisfactory sale is agreed, provided that its terms meet the LSE requirements etc and satisfies the respective Share-holders, it’s as far as the Directors need be concerned. What the consequences/implications become, are beyond their remit. For example: the doubtful trading in the water supply companies. The UK is not good at business regulation.
    If my gloomy prospect is correct, I suggest it is for the Pension Working Groups, who meet with the Government and Pensions Authorities, to raise this warning with them immediately (and continually) until the Government organises the FCA or whoever to institute controls regarding such sales under national security. We certainly do not need a similar situation to the water industry, where pension funds collapse because the funds have all been moved overseas and ‘lost’.
    Kind regards,
    Tim Simpson

  2. henry tapper says:

    Thanks Tim, there is a gathering concern among pension professionals involved in the “endgame”.

  3. Gordon Aitken’s cartoon is a little off, but I missed it when it was first published last November.

    Nokia and Manchester United are still with us when I last looked.

    As for annuitants, I think there have been losses – Equitable Life in this country, Executive Life and Mutual
    Life being US examples.

It makes my day to have your comments!