“Henry has been overtaxed” says the Economist – how did they know?

A friend of mine who clearly knew me when I was a high earner but not rich yet. I didn’t make it to rich as I paid too much tax and what I saved I put into Lady Lucy – my silly boat (still up for sale!)

I don’t know the author but he works for the Economist and the original can be found on this link

 

At the heart of British politics lies a paradox. Tax is forecast to reach 38% of GDP by 2030-31, the highest level since the 1940s. Yet most British workers do not pay much of it. The average single earner in Britain pays less tax on their earnings than most of their peers in the OECD, a rich-country club. They also pay less than they used to. How does the Treasury make the sums add up?

For answers, look to Sue, Henry and Walter. Sue, a Standard Undertaxed Earner, is the median taxpayer, earning £18,700 ($23,100) in 2022. She wins from the current system. New research by Arun Advani, an economist, and his co-authors finds that her average effective tax rate fell from 17% to 12% between 2008 and 2022 (it will have since risen a bit due to stealthy recent tax rises).

Sue is able to enjoy high state spending only thanks to the contributions of her richer friends, Henry and Walter. The top 10% of taxpayers (earning over £51,000) in 2022 received 40.5% of taxable income but paid 60% of income-related taxes. The top 1% (over £173,000) paid an effective average rate of 36% on their remuneration, up from 33% in 2008.

Chart: The Economist

Many politicians like to lump high earners together as “the rich”, a cash-cow that can be forever milked. But Henry and Walter are different people. Henry (High Earner, Not Rich Yet) is a put-upon professional in his 40s, and earns most of his crust through labour. He earns too much for free child care and too little to comfortably afford a family house in inner London.

Walter (Wealthy Already, Lightly Taxed, Ever Richer) is a millionaire many times over. His income mostly comes through capital gains. With four nannies for his four homes, free child care doesn’t matter to him.

Dr Advani finds that Henry and Walter pay very different rates of tax. Half of the top 1% (often Henrys) paid effective tax rates close to the top rate of 47% in 2022. But among the top 0.01% (those with remuneration over £5m in 2022), half paid less than 30% and a quarter less than 20% (see chart). Walter’s secret is low capital-gains tax. The top marginal rate has risen since 2022 from 18% to 24%, but is still well below the 47% top rate for earnings.

And therein lies Henry’s misfortune. Sue has the votes; Walter the accountants. Henry is too rich and too poor to count, so the taxes pile up on him.

Unknown's avatar

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to “Henry has been overtaxed” says the Economist – how did they know?

  1. Unknown's avatar Anonymous says:

    That makes sense – if you are poor – you remain poor, because the government do not like ownership because they don’t want responsibility to run anything themselves and they do not offer any incentive to save or invest. For example whetever happened to ‘The Granny Bonds’.

    • dearieme's avatar dearieme says:

      Granny Bonds are an odd one: if they were on sale at the moment they’d probably be a cheaper way for HMG to raise money than Gilts. After all, people are prepared to hang on to them even when the yield is CPI plus a sparrow fart.

    • dearieme's avatar dearieme says:

      Sue has the votes; Walter the accountants.” Perhaps more important Sue has the votes; Walter the power of exit.

It makes my day to have your comments!