Site icon AgeWage: Making your money work as hard as you do

A capacity crunch?

scorecardThe prospect of debating whether we get a capacity crunch in Auto-enrolment drew a capacity-crunching crowd to Wragge & Co.’s offices yesterday afternoon. Under the convenance of heroically quiffed Andy Agethangelou, some 50 of us attended a symposium on the current state of play for auto-enrolment. The event was sponsored by the CIPP and the audience was a mix of payroll and pension providers, consultants and representatives of trade bodies.

Neil Esslemont spoke for the Pension Regulator; the following bullets are the tweets I put out during his speech, my expanded thoughts are in italics below; I am not sure this is a fair way to report a speech, but it is an accurate representation of “what I heard”!

Following Neil’s opening remarks the 50 or so delegates split into four groups to consider whether the capacity crunch was on its way, when it might happen and what was a “worst case scenario”.

I noted some interesting comments from the floor

The Regulator mentioned that their current biggest concern was with the problems of hidden companies. Many employers use larger employer’s payrolls to pay staff, they are either getting employee’s staged early (as part of the auto-enrolment of other employers, or not at all- as the parent omits these employees (rightly pointing out that they are not their obligation). In the majority of instances these employees are going to be staged in the end of the party sweep in 2017.

The Regulator also had encouraging news on Registration. There had been little evidence of non-registration of employers staging so far (though some had registered late).

The Regulator suggested that where the system was creaking was with companies running out of time with their monthly cycles – typically when they operated a payroll tight up against month end.

So what are we to make of this? I took away a feeling that the administration of auto-enrolment was going well, with no fines being dished out as yet, it does not seem to be auto-enrolment process that is the major concern.

Of more concern was the lack of awareness of what providers were up to and the feeling that both with the legacy of small schemes and with the new schemes being written there was a danger that the pension schemes into which money flowed- might not be fit for purpose.

There were calls for the DWP to publish the capacity of providers to take on new business (not just NEST but other mastertrusts and indeed insurers running GPPs). This sounds like a great idea. We’ve long thought that what is needed is a clearing house to ensure that employers are aware of the choices available (smart readers will have worked out that this is what www.pensionplaypen.com may well end up being!

The consensus was that while 2014 looks like it will work, a lot depended on insurers like Legal and General, Aviva ,Friends and the Scots staying in the game for the smaller end of the SMEs in 2015. Encouraging noises were heard from NEST and People’s who were both represented and sources close to NOW suggested that there was no diminution in the appetite of these organisations post 2015.

When it came to doom mongering, a number of worst case scenarios were touted. To me the most likely threat to auto-enrolment comes from the anti-red-tape campaigners and those who argue that any additional burdens on small business inhibits the “growth agenda”. Political change in 2015, especially a violent swing to the right is to me the main threat.

There was a substantial body of delegates who considered the failure of auto-enrolment might damage the reputation of pensions, my feelings are that the reputation of pensions is pretty well impervious to damage- pensions have a reputation for failing to deliver and the only way is up!

So what is to be done from all this talk (and reading)?

If the CIPP’s Friends of AE are to develop into a meaningful group, there has to be collaboration and a willingness to make auto-enrolment work. Frankly comments about the desirability of failure to suit the business models of some recovery experts, is not helpful. Any hint that there is a secondary agenda at work will not go down well with anyone outside the industry and I suspect that the majority of people in the room have much more self-interest in a successful auto-enrolment process than market failure.

The group is now likely to split into a number of work streams, I’ll volunteer myself to work for a more effective system of sourcing good pensions, others will continue to hurry up the payrolls, others should work towards sorting out problems at retirement and I’d very much hope that the accountancy bodies represented in the room will step up to the plate.

Nothing but good can come from this meeting and I’ll finish by thanking the CIPP, Wragge and Andy Agethangelou for some excellent work.

This post first appeared in www.pensionplaypen.com/topthinking

Exit mobile version