I can’t breathe at the “fiduciary” summit – I find the air’s too thin up there.

Posted on March 20, 2026 by henry tapper

Lords strips mandation from Pension Schemes Bill

Infamously, last Thursday, as my friend Tom was being lauded by the shadow SOS, I suggested to the not very crowded meeting in Edinburgh a repeat of David Cameron’s trick with Ros Altmann.

Ros had been made a baroness  and installed into the House of Lords so she could be Pensions Minister for the Government.

I suggested that Helen Whately suggested Tom McPhail be promoted to be a peer and be an unelected pension spokesperson for the Conservative party.

I will not call the Conservatives the opposition as there are several of them but the Tories have found an opportunistic way to get popular with the ABI, Pensions UK , IFS , Steve Webb and especially Tom McPhail.

The Tories pretend  trustee investment of pension funds is impeccable. For them and their high minded friends , mandation is giving the Government a right to pollute fiduciary air  by letting rip a loud and smelly fart. That’s nonsense.

I am delighted to find that this nonsense from the great and good is not making it to the top of the Corporate Adviser’s pops. A rather more pragmatic approach to getting ordinary people up to 60% better pensions is #1.

The lower house may find the whole argument about mandation too boring for them and give the Lords its amendment but I think that unlikely and so does another former Pensions Minister who sounds a little more realistic than the rest of the opposition.

Either way  will make very little difference to most of us  that do not breathe the thin fiduciary air that we pretend’s for them.

Pensions for ordinary people are the payments they spend to go on holiday or buy their groceries. Ordinary people have no regard for the niceties of fiduciary duties.  They want value from the portion of their pay they and their bosses put away for later.

 

Posted in pensions | Leave a comment

TAS300: “Particularly Delightful Memory” says DWP Minister of State.

Posted on March 20, 2026 by henry tapper

William McGrath has done a great deal to promote TAS300 to help trustees and employers get it right at the point of deciding how a DB scheme proceeds

Regulatory coordination to follow to boost “informed decision making”

The case for maths based run-on v bulk transfer comparisons ahead of strategies being set for DB pension schemes was debated in the House of Lords for the third time on Monday.  Debate extracts attached.

The Baroness Altmann Amendments – strongly backed by knowledgeable members – have been effective.  They can be addressed through coordination between the numerous relevant Regulators and by trustees ensuring they make the fully informed decisions expected of them.

Baroness Sherlock, Minister of State responding for the Government, said during the House of Lords debate:

“The noble Baroness, Lady Altmann, is right to home in on the underpinning goal of these amendments. We want to make sure that trustees continue to take advice on the potential options for their schemes and keep the scheme’s strategy under regular review.

To ensure this, we will continue to work with TPR as it reviews and updates its guidance. We will also engage bodies such as the FCA and, where appropriate, the PRA and the FRC, to ensure alignment across all guidance relating to consideration of alternative options.”

Expect TPR to step up.  TAS300V2.1 (from Financial Reporting Council, the forgotten regulator of actuarial work) has to date been ignored by TPR in its annual Funding Statements, the Funding Code and in Funding and Investment Strategy regulations.  Informed decisions require a realistic, calculated assessment of what is at risk for members and what the inflation protection and value share upsides can be.

Pre-1997 service being covered by PPF and one-off payments being Authorised change the calculations.

Actuarial work has long been subject to very little scrutiny.  Some regulatory coordination through a revised Joint Forum on Actuarial Regulation could go a long way.

C-Suite with its partners have modelling tools and analyses to support informed decision making.

Terrific work by Baroness Altmann.

 

Here is the debate

Posted in pensions | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Pensions Mutual is looking for trustees for its CDC scheme

Posted on March 19, 2026 by henry tapper

We Are Looking for Trustees

As we move forward with the establishment of the Pensions Mutual Unconnected Multi-Employer CDC scheme we are looking for trustees to sit on the scheme Board.  We are particularly keen to appoint individuals who have experience of the Pension Regulator’s MasterTrust authorisation process and/or practical experience of working with CDC.

Candidates are invited to express their interest and share details of their relevant experience by emailing the scheme CEO at stella@pensionsmutual.co.uk before 2nd April  2026.

http://www.pensionsmutual.co.uk

Posted in pensions | Leave a comment

People need more pension, not just moaning about the lack of saving!

Posted on March 19, 2026 by henry tapper

I enjoyed Richard Smith’s post on L&G’s moan about not getting enough paid into workplace pensions

We know only too well that enough money is going into pension pots. Last Friday I listened to a friend telling the few delegates who stayed on to hear him, we need to make pensions a more attractive proposition to the folk who one day will get a pension from them.

I suspect that people who pay into a “pension” will expect a “pension”. Richard and Rory are as one in suggesting we could do better for the people we serve by making the prospect of a pension a little more attractive to the people we serve.

So this Government has decided to put bigger pensions before more contributions and if I was the FD of a major company paying contributions into a workplace pension, the news that the pension that I’d be giving could go up by up to 60% without me having to pay more contributions, I’d be more interested.

If I was younger , I would be looking for value for my money , before investing money into a pension plan the fruits of which would be decades away.

People will use pension boards and find the visit like a visit to the dentist. Richard takes us through that journey in another gem where he reminds us of the pain of the visit, discovering the prospects for the future , the satisfaction of at least engaging with the problem and the worry of the cost of putting things right (for teeth read retirement income).

Let’s finish where we started, with another Richard Smith gem. The bad news coming this time from Standard Life rather than L&G. I hope that both are considering how to improve the pensions from the pots they are helping us build up. It is the pension and not the pot that we’ll be confronted by when going to the dentist …sorry – pension dashboard.

Posted in pensions | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

I hope professional trustees will come to CDC independently

Posted on March 19, 2026 by henry tapper

I was surprised to see  a firm of professional trustees promoting itself with  WTW , who are consultants but also providers of DC services through LifeSight .

I have heard WTW present CDC as an extension of Lifesight , with CDC being available at Retirement (but not before). Most recently I attended an advertorial for itself at Pensions UK’s investment conference.

We do not yet know how Retirement CDC of this type, will emerge and when it will be available so it is odd that it is being promoted to trustees at this early stage. I asked the question of Torsten Bell, will we be getting Retirement CDC draft legislation this year and Torsten Bell told me and 1500 in the hall, we will. I am pleased for CDC and WTW and Lifesight. But it is odd that WTW are so forward in promoting Retirement CDC.

It is also odd that HS Trustees are promoting themselves by being photographed from the top floor of WTW’s City offices in Lime Street (the insurance end of the City).

My hope is that HS Trustees will focus today on what is legislated for today and for which in a couple of months we will have a CDC code.

Both the DWP and TPR have made it clear that trustees should not promote one CDC scheme over another but must stick to the job that trustees have, of making sure that members are treated fairly and that they get the value from their money they’ve put by.

It is important that CDC does not become conflicted. WTW’s potential conflict is that they both advise and provide a DC master trust and much as I like Simon Eagle and Keith McNally and other senior WTW employees who work on CDC, I am aware that the Retirement CDC they hope to use as the default pension for Lifesight  members reaching retirement.

There are other consultants who are not conflicted and who can offer trustees a view of the market that includes whole of life CDC schemes. They may not have the money to throw at trustees in the way that WTW appear to have. But I suspect that it is better governance, a Trustee whether professional or member or employer nominated, to get your information from Government or at least advisers who are unconflicted.

If I was HS Trustees, I would not be posting their photographs in this way, if I was WTW, I would be very careful not to breach the conflict of interest between making money as an adviser and making it as a provider of DC (and at some stage CDC) services.

 

Posted in pensions | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Is America a good place for insured retirement funds from Britain?

Posted on March 19, 2026 by henry tapper

I am pleased to see Calum Kapoor and Mary McDougall working together on an article that looks at the taxation of overseas money invested in American assets. You can read it on a “free share” here.

I profess to be unaware of some of the nuances of the concerns but that two pension stalwarts are writing this article, suggests that the transfer of money that was in DB pensions across the pond to American private equity firms (fronted by UK insurers) is a dangerous practice.

The US Treasury may have moved to reassure some of the country’s biggest foreign investors over a shake-up of tax rules after top sovereign wealth funds warned they could cut their exposure to America if it pressed ahead.

That’s fine if we still had the chance to choose where our pension fund money is invested, but many pensioners have no representation by trustees and only an insurance company to look to for their pension investments.

Under Section 892 of the US tax code, foreign governments and their controlled entities — a category that includes SWFs and some public pension funds — do not pay US tax on what the IRS categorises as investment activity. The Treasury said in response that it was “considering all options” for the proposed regulations, which it had issued “due to requests for certainty from the industry”, the spokesperson added.

I cannot think of any western country that I would trust on tax (including tariffs) than America.

It is time that we thought seriously about the impact of American companies owning British insurance companies and investing money for British companies in America. I will finish how Calum and Mary finish

The proposed regulations come after Section 899 in last year’s “big beautiful bill” threatened to increase taxes on dividends and interest on US stocks and some corporate bonds for foreign investors.

Babak Nikravesh, a partner at law firm Greenberg Traurig who advises a number of sovereign wealth funds, told the FT his clients had been “really concerned” about how hospitable the US would remain and would “have a hard think” when it comes to deploying new cash.

We have the PRA, the BOE and ultimately His Majesty’s Treasury looking out for the safety of those in insurance arrangements. This includes those in retail and bulk annuities.

I hope that the Government’s financial organisations are considering our “wealth” whether “sovereign” or “insured“.

Posted in pensions | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Trustees are for members , not just compliance

Posted on March 19, 2026 by henry tapper

Maggie Roger has written a sensible article that explains why member nominated trustees are essential to good governance.

Increasingly we are seeing professional trustees taking not just the lead role but the only role as trustees. The view that schemes are professional because of their exclusively offer trustees is indeed faulty. I fear too often it is part of what is wrongfully called “de-risking” and is a means of placing compliance as the principle function of trustees.

Maggie Rodger has been a strong advocate of CDC and has spared me time whenever I have met me to explain the work she has been doing with the Church of England CDC scheme. She takes the responsibility of trustees not to market the scheme they are involved in seriously, so this work does not appear in her article but I can say (not as a trustee) that her and the  involvement of the Association of Member Trustees in the selection of trustees, says good things about the CoE CDC scheme to come.

Maggie looks back to Royal Mail

The introduction of member trustees brought an insight into wider member views as well as governance balance. Member-nominated trustees (MNTs) have given confidence to members that their scheme is being run in their interests.

This was demonstrated recently when the Royal Mail member trustees were instrumental in helping their members understand and accept collective defined contribution (CDC).

I will not be shy in saying that CDC can take a step forward from common practice today of DB schemes in wind-up and commercial DC master trusts. CDC scheme can and (I hope) will have representatives not just of employers but of members on extended boards. The Pensions Regulator calls for a minimum of three trustees on a  CDC Trustee Board but I think there is space for more at the table.

I absolutely agree with Maggie Roger when she says

New pension models, such as CDC, will rely for their success on good governance to ensure generational fairness in the design, annual valuation and balancing decisions. Value for money proposals in defined contribution (DC) stop short at the non- numerical concepts of stewardship and service quality. Since these DC models place all the risk on members, either individually, or shared, surely they should be involved in governance of these issues?

The work of the AMNT has been taken up by the TUC in there recent paper and campaign for more representation for members

You can download this paper here.

It is worth reading alongside Maggie’s Professional Pensions article which you can access from here.

There is of course a place for the professional trustee and all trustees including member trustees should be qualified to do their job.  But to suppose that trusteeship starts and ends with compliance with codes is to forget who pension schemes are working for!

Posted in pensions | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Pensions and IHT – Really?

Posted on March 18, 2026 by henry tapper

Here’s yesterday’s Pension PlayPen’s Coffee Morning – an ardent discussion on IHT and Pensions.

Here is the video to go with it

Click the disclaimer to watch the slides live or download the slides from this link.

Posted in pensions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Yeovil’s shocking performance puts me in mind of relegation

Posted on March 18, 2026 by henry tapper

Last night I went down to Woking with my son to watch my side “Yeovil Town” play one of the worst games I’ve ever seen them play. I am glad they got the rollicking they did from their manager.

436 commited fans turn up for Yeovil Town. Shame 18 players cannot do the same.

This is a club with a great past, a great stadium and great support. It is time that it got its act together or it is heading for National League South (again).

Posted in pensions | Tagged , | 2 Comments

We have become too prudent with our long term money

Posted on March 18, 2026 by henry tapper

This is the problem we have. We are a nation that has de-risked and see that as prudent.

I do not want to criticise “individuals”, they have good advocates in Martin Lewis and others, and are right to be prudent when the world is full of predation.

But I wonder if individuals are best off taking decisions on their own , for themselves.

We used to have collective investment that helped out people as varied as miners and postal workers. Only those in the public sector get collective workplace pensions (ok I miss out Royal Mail , USS, Railpen and a few more) but my point is simple.

Left to our own devices, we seek to be prudent and de-risk our finances to a point we have no chance to benefit from the growth of the nation and of the organisations that drive that growth.

That’s not what money in a cash account is good at doing.

We grab our invested funds as soon as we can and cash them out, swapping growth for de-risked prudent cash. Except it’s not prudent or risk-free. That’s because to meet our needs in later life we need our money to grow to beat inflation and last as long as we do!

Let’s not blame individuals for being over-prudent. Instead let’s ask how we can make it easier for us all to invest for growth by encouraging each other to go for growth.

Posted in pensions | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments