Don’t let the bullies grind you down

Talks between the Friends of CDC and the Financial Scientologists broke down last night in merriment.

There were a number of misunderstandings

And it’s true that Malvolio himself did not see the funny side

But I hope I am right when asserting a common desire to do the right thing by those who rely on pensions.


Back in the real world

Over the weekend we read in the Times about Peter Lord who worked for Rolls-Royce for 27 years accumulating a final salary pension which he decided to cash in and invest last year. He set up a SIPP with the £196,000 transfer value on the advice of an IFA who charged him £7483 as a contingent fee. Despite being invested in the market, Peter’s pension is now worth £180,000 – the only withdrawals being to the many fee extractors engaged in managing Peter’s money. Peter has seen no pension.

When Peter’s family asked about what had gone on , Peter could not tell them. He had forgotten. Peter suffers from short-term memory loss after suffering a brain injury as a child. To my mind, this is the story of a vulnerable person who quite clearly doesn’t know what is going on and should now be enjoying a wage for life courtesy of the Rolls-Royce pension scheme.

Financial Economics, from my limited understanding of it, moves schemes like Rolls Royce from equities to gilts and discount rates from 3.5+ to 1.4%. This makes CETVs attractive to Peter Lord and his advisors. The financial economics of having a SIPP with £200,000 appeared better than staying in a scheme which the adviser warned was of the same type as that managed by Robert Maxwell and BHS,

In the real world, financial economics are undermining the social cohesion of our retirement system. Whether in Derby or Port Talbot, Halifax or Dagenham, we are seeing ordinary people with no knowledge of the pension scheme being bamboozled out of good quality pension schemes offering a wage for life, in favour of SIPPS that invest through DFMs in fund of funds that after full extraction – invest in assets about which the “self-invested” policyholder knows nothing.


The destructive force of abstract economics.

The reason we built up over a trillion pounds of assets in pensions was to back the promises to pay pensions to millions of people. In less than a generation, the impact of mark to market accounting has destroyed the trust between employers and trustees and trustees and members so that last year more than £36bn was voluntarily cashed-out , much by people with little understanding of what was going on.

It seems that the social impact of what the financial economists are doing is of no interest to them, they simply decree that those who are trying to help keep order, are “flat wrong”.

I don’t just blame the Modiglianis and the Millets and Exley, Mehta and Smith and all the other theoreticians quoted at me yesterday. I blame those that follow the dictats of financial economics to the exclusion of common sense – blind to the social consequences of where the theory leads them.

Such destruction has been meted on private sector DB plans in the UK, that it is unlikely we will ever see their likes again. The primary reason for their demise was of course the guarantees they were forced to give, which turned best endeavours into full promises.

Attempts to restore open collective schemes in the UK are now being objected to by the financial economists who screwed up DB. Now they are arguing I cannot opine on them unless I read their books. I would rather stick needles in my eyes than read a book on option theory.


We don’t need these financial bullies.

Once again , we are beset by experts;  people who think they know best because they use the longest words and the most complicated utility functions. But experts screw up like everyone else – see 2008.

Common sense tells us that we need a way of converting all this money we are saving into a wage for the rest of our lives; common sense tells us that we can’t all be our own CIOs or even afford our own advisers. We need to do things collectively and rely on each other to bring down costs and insure against freak happenings like us living to 110.

The financial bullies will tell you that financial economics says “no”. They will throw the book at you  – in my case they are throwing their whole freakin’ library!

Resist – live is for living. Debt does not beat equity, it’s better to own and produce than to lend and opine. Mark to Market has no place in open collective pension schemes and these schemes should be talked up and not talked down (as the product of a Green or Maxwell).

We need people to stand up to the bullies and not be shouted down.

 

 

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen, Director of First Actuarial, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in CDC, pensions and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Don’t let the bullies grind you down

  1. Gerry Flynn says:

    Surely the the FCA or the Police should be notified of the Peter Lord case as smacks of blatant fraud, how can there be any justification in transferring out pf such a scheme as Rolls Royce?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s