Dalriada and Smart – do you know why people still invest rubbish AVCs?

I saw this advert and received this invite and accepted.

AVCs and small DC pots may be small in value — but their governance, data, and compliance risks are anything but. In this exclusive webinar, Dalriada and expert partners will unpack why these arrangements are becoming a regulatory and financial tipping point — and how Dalriada. DCC offers a smarter way forward.

The Smarter way forward is to invest your additional voluntary contributions (the ones you don’t have to pay to buy a pension. Of course the number of people paying this type of AVCs in the private sector is massively down as people have stopped being active members in private DB schemes.

So what this is about is focussing on the mess that has been left behind, the legacy of AVCs that Dalriada (the professional trustees) and Smart DC master trust have worked out a solution.  I was told

You’ll learn:

• What the dashboard deadline means for legacy AVCs
• Why decumulation duties require urgent attention
• Where governance failures are hiding in plain sight
• How VfM expectations will impact small arrangements
• What Dalriada’s scalable consolidation model delivers

I registered then  to take the first step toward better AVC governance and got a seminar from the five experts. I asked the two questions that came to my mind. There are a huge number of people paying AVCs in the public pensions, LGPS for starters but also in the Teachers, NHS and other public schemes. So I was interested in whether Smart would offer a better deal for them if they decided to top up their retirement saving using a personal pension rather than troubling the trustees or equivalent in a public DB scheme

I sent in this question (which I saved)

Henry Tapper (You) 10:57 AM
Could you explain why members should put their money into AVCs rather than personal pensions? There are some good personal pensions on the market, how does Smart compare?

I’d got it wrong, this wasn’t a call about getting a better deal for ongoing saving, there is no future saving, this is all about de-risking the past saving which looks like being awkward for trustees needing to deal with VFM assessments , dashboard disclosures and the payment of pensions from DC pots (AVC pots).

Public service pension schemes will allow DC pots to be swapped for extra index-linked public sector pension but in the case of LGPS there’s a different deal. Here you can swap your DC pot for tax-free cash you would otherwise have to swap for pension (lost on not very good pensions). This makes LGPS AVCs really valuable to members and they’re even more popular because many LGPS employers allow AVCs to be saved via “salary sacrifice” with the national insurance advantage shared between employer and members

I made this question (which I saved as well)

Henry Tapper (You) 11:11 AM
In my experience , the AVC is a way of saving for “cash”. This is particularly so in LGPS where the AVC.pot value can be swapped for tax free cash. I’d be interested to know whether this product is available to LGPS members yet?

I’d got it wrong again, this is not being targeted at LGPS, there may be reasons that LGPS can’t contract with a master trust like Smart or it could be that Dalriada don’t see it as an area where they can be trustees.

I am now sure that this initiative is really about cleaning up the mess of legacy AVCs which is good news in terms of VFM for savers who have deferred pots  and trustees (and employers) who need to get VFM, dashboards and pensions sorted out.

But it wasn’t quite what I’d hoped for those paying AVCs in the public sector.


A seminar that left me wondering…

My questions weren’t really the right ones for the seminar, but they are the right ones for public sector schemes and I am putting them in my back pocket to pull out when I speak to people who think about these things (consultants, unions and most of all pension officers).

Yesterday , the Pensions Minister – speaking with one of the “DC pension” providers (L&G) client conference concluded

“We have basically built a system of savings pots, but we’ve told people we’ve built a system of pensions, and if we don’t sort that mismatch, people will start asking: ‘What is this system and why are you asking this much of me?'”

Anyone who is working in the public sector can transfer their DC pot into the scheme for more pension. If only we could consider AVCs as a means to do the same in the private sector.  We might find it catching on everywhere! There is a lot more DC in the public sector than people think and it needs renovation ,  just as workplace pensions did. AVCs, luckily for those in public saving, can be swapped for public sector pension and I hope that Smart and Dalriada find a way to get there product in place where it is most needed.


I’ve left the five speakers , introduced to those on the Dalriada webinar, as I hope that they understand that what savers don’t care for , is what trustees care most about. We don’t want good governance and compliance with complex regulations, we want better pensions please! VFM is at the heart of this.


Webinar Speakers
James Fitzsimmons
Co-creator of the DCC and Accredited Professional Trustee, Dalriada Trustees·Dalriada Trustees
James Fitzsimmons is an Accredited Professional Trustee and joined Dalriada as a Client Manager for Defined Contribution (DC) clients. With a wealth of experience spanning a decade in the industry, James has been instrumental in the day to day running of both DC and hybrid schemes. Over the past three years, he has created processes that oversee the seamless transition of DC arrangements to Master Trusts. Additionally, James has seven years experience as a DC consultant. His expertise extends to navigating the complexities of unwinding DC provisions for Hybrid schemes, demonstrating his astute problem-solving abilities.
Paul Tinslay
Accredited Professional Trustee, Chair·Dalriada Trustees
Paul Tinslay is an Accredited Professional Trustee for DB and DC Pension Schemes, including Chair for Sole Trustee positions, and EGLAS arrangements. With 38 years in the Life and Pensions Industry, Paul has the very rare, if not unique experience of having been a personal financial adviser, as a market leader in the at/post retirement market, a corporate pensions adviser for DB and DC pension schemes. Prior to joining Dalriada in 2020, Paul worked at one of the largest Employee Benefit Consultancies, responsible for delivering advice and services to Employers and Trustees, in respect of Occupational Pensions (Defined Benefit, trust & contract based Defined Contribution), where he was also Head of the Pensions Governance Proposition. Paul has been a Director of specialist pensions businesses, establishing market leading propositions. Paul worked with the Government Actuary’s Department to develop Income Drawdown in the Pensions Act 1995 and the Department for Work and Pensions in transposing the IORP II legislation to what we now know as ESoG and ORA.
Gavin Collinson
Business Development Director·Smart Pension
Gavin has worked in the pensions industry for over 25 years. Initially in operations and consulting roles with Mercer and Alexander Forbes. Gavin moved into the Master Trust world in 2012 with time at The People’s Partnership and NOW: Pensions before landing at Smart Pension shortly after its launch in 2016. Building meaningful relationships with key consultancies and trustees is a passion of Gavin’s – ultimately always with the view of better serving employers and members. Outside of work Gavin enjoys cycling and fell running as well as spending time with a growing brood of grandchildren.
Brenda Kite
DC Platform Solutions Specialist·Hymans Robertson
Brenda joined Hymans in 2014 and has many years’ experience in the pension industry including spells at a provider, fund manager, benefit and investment consultants. In that time she managed two investment platforms, worked on the introduction of new DC funds and development of lifestyle strategies as well as working on many AVC and DC benefit transfer exercises. Brenda has also been closely involved with AVCs and With Profits over the years and now specialises in consultancy exercises for schemes with legacy DC provision including AVCs, With Profits and buy-outs of AVC and DC sections of hybrid DB/DC schemes. Brenda has contributed to our responses on several government consultations including private markets and value for members and helped develop the SPP template for DC governance statements. Meanwhile, Brenda is actively involved in our Diversity, Equity & Inclusion programme and LGBTQ+ group.
Jo Tibbott
Partner·Gowling WLG
Jo is a partner in our pensions team and helps her trustee and employer clients navigate the complex world of pensions in a pragmatic and clear way. She is based in our Birmingham office but works with clients (both defined benefit and defined contribution) across the UK and those with sponsors in different jurisdictions. Jo’s focus is on delivering excellent client service and building long-term relationships with her clients. She advises trustees of schemes in sectors ranging from financial services to the automotive sector. She also works with the boards of authorised master trusts. She leads our DC Excellence team and chairs our firm’s independent governance committee. Jo is also a trustee of a local charity Molly Ollys Wishes. In her spare time she enjoys running, walking her Schnoodle Pepper and her favourite pastime – watching her children play sport.

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Dalriada and Smart – do you know why people still invest rubbish AVCs?

  1. Richatrd Chilton says:

    I am still confused by this. The normal reason people save into AVCs is to take the whole lot out as part of the PCLS when starting the linked DB pension – result tax-free cash and a higher DB pension. Transfer the AVC out and you can’t do this anymore. AVCs can have a few, and often a lot, of investments you can choose from so pick or transfer to one that meets your needs.

  2. henry tapper says:

    Richard, I think you are right and this is the flaw in the concept. To me – the concept of AVCs within the DB pension system makes sense (so long as the rules allow the AVC to be taken as pension scheme). I don’t think the rules of private DB schemes usually do so the Smart/Dalriada is simply an outsource of trustee liabilities. Let’s hope that we have these kind of conversations going forward, rather than one that focusses on the problems AVCs cause (nowadays increasingly professional) trustees

    • Richard Chilton says:

      Thanks. I could take my AVC as part of the PCLS when starting my (private sector) DB pension and the other private sector DB schemes I have come across mostly seem to allow this as well. However, I do know of one that doesn’t and that one also refused to change its rules to allow that to happen (even though it was allowed under HMRC rules).

      • henry tapper says:

        I would be interested to hear from trustees and experienced consultants as well as members as to the number of schemes offering a swap of cash from the AVC for tax free cash sum. I think most would prefer to keep the pension intact unless the factors work for the member.

  3. henry tapper says:

    Anonymous contribution made by text;

    “You asked for trustee experiences of AVCs.

    Most of the AVCs I saw were treated at retirement on a money purchase basis, but Richard is right that they can form an important part of PCLS planning.

    My only experience of “DB” AVCs was at Railpen. BRASS (Building Retirement And Security Scheme) AVCs were designed to buy additional DB pension within the Railways Pension Scheme (RPS).

    An arguably generous conversion rate of £12 in lump sum for £1 in additional annual DB pension applied to members with protected rights at privatisation.

    You’ll recall Bryn Davies highlighted the flip side of this formula when suggesting a 12-for-1 “tax free” lump sum in a public sector DB scheme wasn’t a particularly generous exchange.

    Railway BRASS always struck me as generous, particularly when employers “matched” the member contributions.

    In more recent years, matching was withdrawn by some employers and limits placed on annual AVCs and conversion terms by some employers.

    I don’t think this railway AVC story is really relevant to the Smart Dalriada offering, aimed at small values with potentially high costs.

    But if you want someone to talk about AVCs at the larger schemes, Railpen could be a good place to go.

    USS also offers AVCs through its Investment Builder and has/had a separate Added Years AVC option, allowing members to save more for retirement, increase defined benefits, or build a separate pension pot.

    I think, however, USS curbed the Added Years option from 2016.

    As I’m now very much a retired trustee, I feel my own historic knowledge of AVCs is very out-of-date.

  4. Dennis Leech says:

    If I may correct you, Henry, based on personal experience, I dont think it is true that all public DB schemes allow money purchase AVC pots to buy additional main scheme pension. Both my wife and I invested heavily in AVCs run by the Prudential linked to our respective pension schemes: the Teachers and USS. On retirement my wife was not allowed to buy extra TPS pension and she had to treat it as if it were a DC pot and buy an annuity with it after taking 25pc tax free cash. OTOH I the USS rules allowed me to convert the whole sum into the pension scheme.

    • henry tapper says:

      USS feels like a public scheme but is a private scheme ( I think). If you are in the USS DB and DC section , you can use the DC section for tax free cash, using external AVCs is different – it is as you say. TPS is a public scheme and has public scheme rules – as you say. I think the lesson is that AVCs are really hard and the Dalriada / Smart offering is right for a part of the DB market , but needs a lot of care before it is used!

Leave a Reply to henry tapperCancel reply