A psychiatric consultant finds herself paying more in tax than she earns. A spokesperson for the pensions industry opines.
I understand Dr Kate Lovett has has a large increase in her DB pension, which breaches the Annual Allowance pension rules designed (quite rightly) to limit pension tax relief for very high earners. To ignore this is disingenuous https://t.co/eoRFHqARQV
— John Ralfe (@JohnRalfe1) October 25, 2019
Dr Kate Lovett had introduced herself to the world of pension experts very precisely
I am a doctor. I work hard. I have never done private work. I have spent the last 29 years in the service of the British public looking after NHS patients #WorkHardBritain
— Dr Kate Lovett (@DrKateLovett) October 23, 2019
A consultant psychiatrist , she had failed to take an advanced course in pensions taxation
Today I have found out that my tax bill for last year works out over 20k more than I earned in the entire year #WorkHardBritain
— Dr Kate Lovett (@DrKateLovett) October 23, 2019
and this was how she felt about it.
It’s a sad state of affairs which quickly caught the interest of the press
Day 2 #PensionTaxHell Apparently my situation is a big deal. But don’t be misled by the headline. If you replace the word top with middle-aged or even experienced, you’ll get a better picture of how widespread this problem is https://t.co/LmQ8NOhrSV
— Dr Kate Lovett (@DrKateLovett) October 25, 2019
Day three didn’t work out too well either
So many people have contacted me telling me they think I am being robbed over #PensionTaxHell Whilst I still can’t believe the situation I am in the theft of time feels very real https://t.co/WbqxsqH0vw
— Dr Kate Lovett (@DrKateLovett) October 26, 2019
Why has this happened?
As John Ralfe rightly points out, Dr Lovett is being penalised for accruing too much pension in a single year. But the intention of the Annual Allowance was never to penalise people like her.
Her situation is the unintended consequence of a sticking plaster applied by a Government that had failed in its attempt to radically reform pension tax relief.
And with a cruel circularity, BREXIT – the reason the Osborne/Cameron Government shelved the taxation consultation of 2015 is also the reason we won’t get a budget in 2019. Five years of fiscal paralysis at the Treasury, five years where the sticking plaster has worn off to reveal the open wounds of a tax system that doesn’t work.
How should we react?
The stern response from John Ralfe is not the right response, it lacks emotional intelligence and humanity. You do not tell a patient that his or her ailment was avoidable as they sit in casualty. Instead you give consolation and the promise of attention, immediate attention.
The failure of the coalition Government to implement a lasting reform to pensions taxation is almost as heinous a policy failure as its failure to implement pension freedoms without a safety net.
We pensions people should react with outrage that tax scandals as wide ranging as those affecting high earners and those who pay no tax at all are unaddressed for so long.
I started writing about the net pay scandal five years ago when Kate Upcraft pointed out that holding down the AE earnings threshold and raising the income tax threshold would lead to problems for net-pay pension schemes.
I started writing about the AA taper when certain doctors at the start of this year brought to our attention the impact on the NHS from doctors cutting their overtime to avoid double taxation.
But the blogs I wrote four and five years ago about the fundamental unfairness of pension taxation go the heart of the matter. Until we find a fairer way to distribute the forty billion pounds we give back to pension savers through tax relief and incentives sticking plaster solutions will stay in place.
We should react with resolution not complacency. Pension taxation creates gross inequalities that are embedded in the EET system. A transition to TEE is to be hoped for and could be accomplished over time using the scheme pays apparatus. We know the Treasury has done its sums and has a plan. It sits on a shelf but could be taken down, dusted off and implemented as it should have been in 2016.
Once we’ve got this Brexit thing out of the way, we need to get back to basics – because we can’t have doctors like Kate Lovett , treated like this, nor can we have 1.7m low-earners treated just as badly. We need to get back to the pre-Brexit pension taxation consultation and complete the work that had been started. This needs to happen in 2020.