Are insurers really that safe? Toby Nangle joins the “worrywarts”

Somewhere , deep into an examination of how insurance companies operate in the US and to a degree in Europe and hence the UK, is this paragraph

All that said, we can see why regulators and worrywart investors are taking a closer look at the whole nexus. And only time will tell as to how the mix of private credit, CLOs and offshore reinsurance delivers for PE-linked insurers the next time there is a downturn in the credit cycle, or some exogenous event that causes a jump in policy cancellations — and in the process testing the assumption that illiquidity is fine and dandy.

This is the new type of journalism brought to us by the bright-eyed Nangle. It makes us read stuff we would not ever read, because we love the words, the sentence structures and finally the big ideas that are carried by microscopic study of data. This is good stuff, I spent 45 minutes this morning making my way through Toby’s Alphaville piece only to find that better minds than mine had been there before.

Here is Luke Webster

A masterful elucidation of a complex set of topics from Toby Nangle

“We can’t be sure whether the outsized share of balance sheet held in private structured securities by PE-sponsored insurers is directly related to this arbitrage. But we do know that private equity people excel at extracting free money.”

I wouldn’t conclude from this article any particular turpitude from PE – indeed, what this highlights is very efficient capture of opportunities that regulatory frameworks incentivise – however it does highlight the point I probably make too often: insurers are *not* public benefit corporations; while they undoubtedly have a valuable role to play in society, the image that life insurance in particular has managed to promulgate, enabled by certain regulators, disguises an an enormous transfer of wealth via premiums (looking all too much like easy money), generally followed by a diversion of pension assets from productive, transparent or low-cost investments to things that might not score well on any of those three metrics.

View Toby Nangle’s graphic link

And Toby on his own work

This is not easy and requires a weekend worth of time to understand. Goodness knows how long it took the man to put this together and how important it is that those of us who work in this part of the life and pensions industry know what is going on.

But Nangle’s research and what he has found is worrying people I associate with and I thank them for making their positions clear

Of course I am a pensioner and don’t work for an insurer, there is a misalignment of reward – the pensioner should be rewarded more, the insurer less.

Let’s let Edi have the last say and then ask him to stop being brilliant as he recovers from a chest infection.

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply