It’s amazing how excited these people got when they found their Nest Pension was working for them
I would like to see Nest line up with the DWP and Treasury to allow those with a Nest pot to swap it for more State Pension at state retirement age.
This seems to be an obvious way of paying pensions in return for capital Government can invest!
Government should give pensioners a good rate of exchange, reflecting the return they expect to get on our money!
This was a comment I made on a blog inspired by Nest’s Paul Todd. There are 13 m of us in Nest, more than a quarter of the working population has a Nest pension and more than half of us are in the kind of workplace savings scheme which pay a pot not a pension.
This cannot continue. The default position for those with pots must be to convert to pensions. This is not to require all but the well off to annuitize, this was how it was till 2015 and it meant that most of us ended up in annuities we bought without much skill. In its early days, Nest said that you got an annuity at a rate it set with the provider being chosen by a spin of a roulette wheel. Thankfully that idea was soon dropped but it shows how little interest in the outcomes of pension saving.
A remarkable man, Ray Chinn, once stood up in front of a group of us and admitted that a high percentage of those who were asked what they were doing with Nest, thought they were buying state pension. Ray was Retirement Options officer for Nest.
I expect that one of the plethora of restrictions placed on Nest to ensure that it doesn’t out compete its commercial rivals is that it doesn’t do what most people think will happen, which is to pay them a pension. There is of course no mechanism for paying pensions from DC pots at the moment but I think there should be and I’ve got a mechanism to do so.
But enough of self-promotion, the bottom line is that even an extra £10 per week on the state pension is regarded as good news. At the moment £10 per week of state pension at 66 costs around £7,500 which is around what a “pension” pot is worth
That is what’s left of a £10,000 pot after you take away £2,500 as a tax free cash pot and if all you had was £520 pa on top of your state pension, you would not be paying tax on your income.
Of course most people with Nest Pots get more income in retirement than from the State Pension and some people would not consent to have their Nest pension paid as state pension at an agreed conversion rate, but judging by the numbers who choose not to choose and default with Nest , I reckon the majority of people still with pots at 66 (67 in a couple of years) would be happy to take 75% of their pot as state pension.

I was chatting about this with a friend over lunch. She thought that the PPF should use its obscene surplus to pay Nest pensions in exchange for Nest pots. I thought that quite neat as PPF are a well run and increasingly powerful investor who could pay more as a pension than you’d get from an annuity (I’ve done the sums and not much risk has to be taken to pay better pensions than annuities, especially if you are not for profit as PPF is).
I support this proposal regarding the PPF. However, it should come alongside the removal of the 10% arbitrary haircut. And the payment of payment of pre-97 increases where they exist pre-transfer.
Thanks for the name check Henry and a reminder of days gone by. As I look to my future in retirement – with a modest Nest ‘pot’ still part of the equation, I quite like this idea that your friend has put forward. With annuities making some sort of a comeback and the govt desperate for greater investment capital there must be some way of linking these ideas as you’ve suggested. Would fit with the expectations of many Nest members I’m sure i.e. a regular income throughout retirement, albeit a smaller income than they expect. p.s. hope your recovery is going well.
I proposed small pots could be used to buy additional State pension many years ago. As the State pension can be topped up by one off payments (rate fixed by GAD) where there was a shortfall caused by incomplete NI history. It would be a small step for the government to expand that process. However that will not go down well with the annuity industry, as it would be deemed “unfair” market distorting competition.
However the same arguments were raised by Insurers for setting up Nest. The pensions insurance industry was anti NEST, for the same reasons. However amazingly common sense prevailed and NEST was set up with certain restrictions (and a public service obligation to take on those AE schemes Insurers did not want).
I see no reason why something similar could now be done for small AE pots.
“As the State pension can be topped up by one off payments (rate fixed by GAD) where there was a shortfall…”
Does that extend to WASPI compensation?
Rachel and Sir Keir of course say the money’s not there, but I think it was.
The National Insurance “Fund” (budgeted to have one-sixth of the UK’s annual benefits spend as a working balance at all times) at the last fiscal year-end was £86bn, two-thirds of annual spend, four times the budget. HM Treasury had also set aside another £6.5bn, if needed.
Waspi comp at an average of £2,950 for all only needs around £10bn.