A conversation, maybe an argument with Arun Muralidhar! Pension Playpen Tuesday 25th

I am not sure I quite know what Arun is going on (he tells me I misunderstand him)

But he is a man full of energy whose ideas are gaining traction around the world. So I am inviting him to the Pension PlayPen so I can get things straight between us and in the process start what I hope will be a lively debate on what is one of our most pressing problems- how to turn pots and contributions into a wage in later age.

Arun impressed on Stefan Lundbergh’s podcast and I want to hear him speak again. We may end up falling out – but I doubt it. Apart from being clever, Arun’s a totalgent.

Arun is so keen to speak to us that he is presenting at 5.30 am in his time – he tells us that he may be in his pajamas, I suspect that we won’t be – but whatever – this looks to be one of the most exciting and argumentative sessions we’ve had this year.

 

Unknown's avatar

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A conversation, maybe an argument with Arun Muralidhar! Pension Playpen Tuesday 25th

  1. BenefitJack's avatar BenefitJack says:

    My understanding is that the Selfie is a government issued bond that offers purchasers an indexed standard of living guaranteed by taxpayers. I live in the states where taxpayers are already concerned with insufficient funding of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid – especially in light of $2+ Trillion in annual federal budget deficits for as far as the eye can see or the CBO cares to project, on top of $31+Trillion in national debt … AND … a debt ceiling stalemate. Congress continues to focus on the wrong stuff. See: https://401kspecialistmag.com/secure-2-0-more-impactful-stuff-plan-sponsors-dont-need-didnt-ask-for/

    My understanding is that with a Selfie, the government is responsible to index returns for inflation (so, the government (taxpayers) shoulder the risk). That risk can be hedged with a VAT – as the tax burden automatically increases as costs increase.

    Of course, in the states, there is no VAT. Despite that, we’ve experienced a significant increase in revenues … growing from about $2 Trillion at the turn of the century to $4.6 Trillion (FY 2023), while we have averaged less than 3% inflation (as measured by the CPI). But, spending has grown from about $2 Trillion to $6+ Trillion (FY 2023)!

    Worse, many (most) American workers have experienced a decline in their standard of living decline – wages haven’t kept pact – obvious since the pandemic:
    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/realer.htm#:~:text=Real%20average%20weekly%20earnings%20decreased,March%202022%20to%20March%202023.

    In America, those age 65+, as a group, have much lower levels of poverty when compared to those ages 18 – 64, and those under age 18.

    So, concerned about introduce new liabilities on future taxpayers.

It makes my day to have your comments!