When having a baby , short-changes women’s pensions – illegally.

I’m really glad that I found Felicia and this conversation on her linked in feed. She has joined Pension PlayPen and I was not gracious enough to get connected. I’ve read this thread and realise my mistake – this is a link to the post below.

Women are getting short-changed on pensions when they are off work to have a baby. Felicia Flinders explains how and wonders why.

These are the comments that follow, telling you that there are people outside the pension bubble who do give a damn for women’s pensions!

I am pleased to find people like Felecia, they are rare souls and they are not nurtured within the financial services community.

We care “in abstract” for the pensions of women and ignore the practicalities of funding women’s pensions. If there are people in HR and Finance reading this who change their policy towards women on maternity then Felecia will have done good with this post.

This is the proper use of social media and space on social media. If Felecia wants to send her thoughts to me, she will – as Gareth Morgan does – get prime place!

I hope that the matter bought up on Felicia Flinders’ thread, get’s wider publicity than it’s had so far!