How our pensions are thought of and debated by those who represent us

John Glen – impassioned on pensions in Westminster Hall

How pensions are treated in parliament is set out admirably by William Wright. I cannot remember intensity of debate on pensions like we’re doing and it’s not just around show-pieces like the Budget and the readings of the Pension Schemes Bill. Politics is not everything but it’s a debate by people who represent us. John Glen is MP for Salisbury as well as a former Minister in the Treasury, Richard Tice is outspoken as Reform is; Reform reflects the current mood of more of us than any other party. The Liberals are taking an interest in pensions, I haven’t seen since Steve Webb departed the Chamber in 2016

I do not hear an argument against fiduciary intervention through mandation. Steve Darling, the Liberal spokesperson remarks upon the danger of loss of liberty (a very liberal thought) but I do not get a general aversion to what Bell is proposing in the Bill.

Sometimes we underestimate the notion of ” a nation” and think that what people are saying is what we are told in our conference halls. I am more interested by what is being said in parliament and the extent to which it reflects what ordinary people think.

There are a lot of reasons people have to be angry with what has or hasn’t happened in terms of implementing promises. But I do not think that pensions is an area that ordinary people feel hard done by. It’s the extraordinary people, those with superfluous wealth who have lost out since July 2024.

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to How our pensions are thought of and debated by those who represent us

  1. John Mather says:

    “ But I do not think that pensions is an area that
    ordinary people feel hard done by.‘

    Until they get the first pension payment.

    It would be desirable to engage the 94% (unadvised)
    at an earlier stage and for a retirement term appropriate
    for 2050 instead of 1945.

Leave a Reply