
I saw this advert and received this invite and accepted.
AVCs and small DC pots may be small in value — but their governance, data, and compliance risks are anything but. In this exclusive webinar, Dalriada and expert partners will unpack why these arrangements are becoming a regulatory and financial tipping point — and how Dalriada. DCC offers a smarter way forward.
The Smarter way forward is to invest your additional voluntary contributions (the ones you don’t have to pay to buy a pension. Of course the number of people paying this type of AVCs in the private sector is massively down as people have stopped being active members in private DB schemes.
So what this is about is focussing on the mess that has been left behind, the legacy of AVCs that Dalriada (the professional trustees) and Smart DC master trust have worked out a solution. I was told
You’ll learn:
• What the dashboard deadline means for legacy AVCs
• Why decumulation duties require urgent attention
• Where governance failures are hiding in plain sight
• How VfM expectations will impact small arrangements
• What Dalriada’s scalable consolidation model delivers
I registered then to take the first step toward better AVC governance and got a seminar from the five experts. I asked the two questions that came to my mind. There are a huge number of people paying AVCs in the public pensions, LGPS for starters but also in the Teachers, NHS and other public schemes. So I was interested in whether Smart would offer a better deal for them if they decided to top up their retirement saving using a personal pension rather than troubling the trustees or equivalent in a public DB scheme
I sent in this question (which I saved)
Henry Tapper (You) 10:57 AM
Could you explain why members should put their money into AVCs rather than personal pensions? There are some good personal pensions on the market, how does Smart compare?
I’d got it wrong, this wasn’t a call about getting a better deal for ongoing saving, there is no future saving, this is all about de-risking the past saving which looks like being awkward for trustees needing to deal with VFM assessments , dashboard disclosures and the payment of pensions from DC pots (AVC pots).
Public service pension schemes will allow DC pots to be swapped for extra index-linked public sector pension but in the case of LGPS there’s a different deal. Here you can swap your DC pot for tax-free cash you would otherwise have to swap for pension (lost on not very good pensions). This makes LGPS AVCs really valuable to members and they’re even more popular because many LGPS employers allow AVCs to be saved via “salary sacrifice” with the national insurance advantage shared between employer and members
I made this question (which I saved as well)
Henry Tapper (You) 11:11 AM
In my experience , the AVC is a way of saving for “cash”. This is particularly so in LGPS where the AVC.pot value can be swapped for tax free cash. I’d be interested to know whether this product is available to LGPS members yet?
I’d got it wrong again, this is not being targeted at LGPS, there may be reasons that LGPS can’t contract with a master trust like Smart or it could be that Dalriada don’t see it as an area where they can be trustees.
I am now sure that this initiative is really about cleaning up the mess of legacy AVCs which is good news in terms of VFM for savers who have deferred pots and trustees (and employers) who need to get VFM, dashboards and pensions sorted out.
But it wasn’t quite what I’d hoped for those paying AVCs in the public sector.
A seminar that left me wondering…
My questions weren’t really the right ones for the seminar, but they are the right ones for public sector schemes and I am putting them in my back pocket to pull out when I speak to people who think about these things (consultants, unions and most of all pension officers).
Yesterday , the Pensions Minister – speaking with one of the “DC pension” providers (L&G) client conference concluded
“We have basically built a system of savings pots, but we’ve told people we’ve built a system of pensions, and if we don’t sort that mismatch, people will start asking: ‘What is this system and why are you asking this much of me?'”
Anyone who is working in the public sector can transfer their DC pot into the scheme for more pension. If only we could consider AVCs as a means to do the same in the private sector. We might find it catching on everywhere! There is a lot more DC in the public sector than people think and it needs renovation , just as workplace pensions did. AVCs, luckily for those in public saving, can be swapped for public sector pension and I hope that Smart and Dalriada find a way to get there product in place where it is most needed.
I’ve left the five speakers , introduced to those on the Dalriada webinar, as I hope that they understand that what savers don’t care for , is what trustees care most about. We don’t want good governance and compliance with complex regulations, we want better pensions please! VFM is at the heart of this.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
