In the battle of Brexit – are we the home guard?


Recently I went to the Battle of Ideas Festival. It made me think how we might make a good pensions system work for Britain (we usually think the other way round).

Most political ideas revolve around Brexit, so why not try out this way of thinking here. How could a better pension system ease Britain through Brexit? There’s no doubt that the changes (however soft we can make them) will put a strain on the organisations we work for. We may not be fighting at the front – but can’t we help out like the Home Guard did?

I’ve been thinking about this a few days now and have come up with 4 ideas, you might come up with more of your own. How good would it be if we had a conversation with Government which started – “here’s how we might help”.

My first idea is about productivity. Britain’s productivity lags our OECD peer group. One of the reasons for this is we do not invest in technology and training; we neither have the systems or the skills to out-produce our neighbours. What could pension funds do to allow employers the time and resources to tech-up and skill-up? Could we find better ways to share the risk of pension underfunding than by demanding our schemes are funded to buy-out every valuation? Could we move to a more progressive way of valuing pension scheme liabilities?

My second idea is about cost to employers of operating pension schemes. Currently we have 46,000 DC occupational pensions. This can hardly be efficient. What if we narrowed this down to 460 or even 46? What would we lose? Perhaps we’d lose the vanity of having our own company pension, we’d lose the perks of being a trustee and many advisers would lose fees. Come to think of it fees would fall for asset managers too. But this would be to the advantage of employers and staff who have to pick up these costs from the P/L or from retirement outcomes. Add to this the benefits of bringing new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence and the Block chain into our systems and processes, couldn’t we make it easier for our employers to make it through Brexit,

My third idea is about wellbeing. I think that happy staff are more stable and savvy – do more and better work. Financial wellbeing can be improved in the workplace if employers are prepared to financially empower workers. Whether through distance learning, face to face advice or making available financial guidance, there are many ways we can use our skills to improve worker’s experience of work. There is of course a synergy – work and pensions are both boring – why not do the two together, improve our financial wellbeing and improve the human resource while about it.

My final idea is about attitude. I am struck when I talk to the natural leaders I meet, that they are not moaners but inspirers. I think of business leaders like Nigel Wilson of L&G and Stephen Kelly of Sage, I think too of pension leaders such as Michelle Cracknell, Otto Thorensen and Laurence Churchill. You won’t spend time with them without wanting to do something positive as a result.,

So there are four ideas I’ll use to turn Brexit from a problem to an opportunity. One to with investment, two to do with efficiency, three to do with empowerment and four to do with attitude.

Somebody told me that Brexit was our biggest national challenge since the second world war. Blimey – if Britain had sat around and moaned about being at war instead of getting on and winning it, we’d all be speaking German today!

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in Brexit, pensions and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to In the battle of Brexit – are we the home guard?

  1. Duncan S says:

    Makes complete sense Henry – I can only hope that some of the people that can make those decisions are readers of your blog!

  2. henry tapper says:

    Thanks Duncan

Leave a Reply