Why is Labour so rubbish with pensions?

This is not a good look. The Labour party has yet to appoint a Shadow Pensions Minister following the recent resignation of Gill Furniss (for personal reasons).

Rachel Reeves is looking for pensions to fuel the Growth Agenda but she can’t control that agenda from the Treasury, she needs people getting down and dirty with the people who manage the £3 trillion invested for our retirement.

There are people who can do the job within the parliamentary party – most notably Stephen Timms, there are people in the Lords who could do the job (Bryn Davies and Jeannie Drake) and there are those in industry who could be elevated to the upper house to step up from shadow to actual pension minister (Gregg McClymont).

Sadly, Hilary Salt is otherwise committed

Right person – wrong party

I simply don’t understand why Labour is unable to have a pension spokesperson at this crucial junction. Maybe they were waiting for Liz Kendall (Shadow SOS at DWP) to get back from illness.

I’m pleased to see she is now back and speaking to Trevor Phillips about the triple lock this (Sunday) morning

But we need more than high level comment on the triple lock. We want to know some nitty-gritty, the stuff that people need to make sense of all the “pension” saving that they’re doing.  And the pension industry wants more than a promise that their will be a general review of pensions, the other side of a general election (what we’re getting now).

In short we  need the kind of manifesto pledges on pensions that allow us to plan for the future.  Labour is simply not delivering,

It’s not like the Trade Unions don’t care; they supply a good percentage of the member nominated trustees still populating trustee boards, they are the power behind CDC through the CWU and Unite Unions and collectivism is in their blood.

What is wrong with the parliamentary party? Where is the organisation within the wider Labour party to take the brilliant ideas of Chris Sier, Andy Tarrant, Con Keating and Terry Pullinger forward?

I am not a member of the Labour party but I’d be happy to join forces with them to promote a collective agenda against the prevailing pessimism of the past fourteen years.

So come on Labour , shape up your ideas and (if you haven’t got a better plan) contact me at henry@agewage.com – whoever you are!

 

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Why is Labour so rubbish with pensions?

  1. Bryn Davies says:

    But Liz gives an excellent defence of the triple lock on Sky News and promises reform of second pensions.

  2. henry tapper says:

    I’m glad she’s defending the triple lock (though I can’t find the defence on Sky News). I heard Liz Kendall at the TUC pensions event read a pre-prepared speech and the last statement I read from her (Demos speech – https://labourlist.org/2024/03/labour-party-work-budget-2024-workers-unemployed-young-people-plan-benefit-work/) does not mention pensions at all. The only Labour politicians we can speak to right now are in the Lords. Come on Bryn – it’s not a tough job – Conservatives have to be brought to account for failing to deliver on key policies (SPA, Dashboard, AE rates, CDC,) they couldn’t even agree a DB funding code!

  3. Bryn Davies says:

    She was on Trevor Phillips.

  4. henry tapper says:

    Thanks – I’ve now posted the clip of Liz Kendall explaining why Labour will support the Triple Lock (which I support). But this is not enough. For years , we have tried to engage Matt Rodda , Gill Furniss and their predecessors. Rachel Reeves says that pensions are key to her growth plans, but what does Labour want to do in practice?

    The policy vacuum is hard to understand.

Leave a Reply to henry tapperCancel reply