A lot of things are “easier than pensions” – but they don’t pay the bills

Electric cars are a hot company perk and the CIPD’s Charles Cotton points out in the FT that it’s easier to sell a job on a new motor than security in later life. This is especially true, if that security no longer comes in the shape of a roadworthy pension vehicle “but a set of parts without an instruction manual” (analogy c/o Cath Donnelly- Herriot Watt)

This has always been the problem with categorising a pension as an “employee benefit” rather than “deferred pay”.

Pensions cannot be compared with company cars (electric or otherwise) , they do a different thing, they insure us against the cost of old age and give us hope as we struggle on that there will be a time when we will have enough coming in to stop work.

A few organisations still believe in this and put pensions at the heart of what they do. I think to Royal Mail who have never compromised on their staff welfare. I think of Terry Pullinger, the CWU’s DG’s comment that he became a postman because postmen got proper pensions. How many people of my age (62), wish they could say the same.

This is not a dig at Charles Cotton, who is a stalwart and a decent man, he was speaking half in jest. However, so long as pensions are relegated to equivalence to cars in a flex-roster, they will fall down the list of perks, as surely as a stone falls through water.

For all the good that auto-enrolment has done, it has failed to re-assert pensions as deferred pay. This is largely down to the focus on workplace pensions shifting to contribution rates, charges and ephemera such as “web-access” – (about as much use to most of us as heated seats in our company car). We know what cars do, we have little idea what our pension saving does – other than to give us a long-term headache over how to spend our money.

We really need to stop making pensions “hard” and return to a concept of pensions making life “easy”. It may not be easy to run a pension fund (which is why pension people are expert and rewarded as such), but it should be easy to be in one and easy to be paid a pension.

This “pensions are hard” nonsense is a construct of those who see “de-risking” as “do it yourself”. Since when did a Tesla come in a flatpack?

A lot of things are easier than pensions, but they don’t pay the bills. Consign pensions to being an employee benefit and you will continue to have flat-pack retirements.

It’s time we made looking forward to our pension as pleasurable as getting into that shiny new electric car.

 

 

About henry tapper

Founder of the Pension PlayPen,, partner of Stella, father of Olly . I am the Pension Plowman
This entry was posted in pensions and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to A lot of things are “easier than pensions” – but they don’t pay the bills

  1. Byron McKeeby says:

    Cath Donnelly’s university is Heriot-Watt partly after George Heriot, the goldsmith to 16th century Scottish court, not James Herriot, the fictional
    Yorkshire vet named after a certain Scottish goalkeeper.

Leave a Reply to Byron McKeebyCancel reply