Site icon AgeWage: Making your money work as hard as you do

Consolidation constipation – Reeves gets pension plumbing.

Rachel Reeves has not started well on pensions. Pensioners are angry that most are missing out on winter fuel payments. because of the hike in employers NI.

The OBR are now forecasting that the 2017 AE reforms won’t be enacted till after 2030

Her budget has thrown the wealth management sector into confusion over pensions and inheritance planning. For what may be worthy reasons, she has made herself unpopular, the Mansion House speech tonight has been billed as her chance to set things right.

I don’t get the Treasury briefings on the Mansion House speech but its headlines are on show wherever you go for pension news

Portraying Reeves’ speech with a budget red box suggests she’s delivering the budget part 2 and Reeves clearly thinks that the measures she’s proposing tonight will counteract what has come so far.

There are several  proposals leaded to the press , all  aimed at relieving consolidation constipation. Our pensions plumber will

  1. Require the 86 local authority funds to consolidate their investments through the 8 existing pools and force the pools to become asset managers rather than procurement platforms –  requiring them all to register with the FCA (at present less than half have this status).
  2. Set the bar for DC master trusts at £25bn with an aspiration of £50bn in assets under each trust.
  3. There is a reference to reforming contract based workplace pensions
  4. Reeves said she would legislate next year to enact “some of the biggest reforms to pensions in a generation”,

It looks as if Pension Oldie, who has campaigning for reform to DB pensions will have to wait till early next year. The DWP’s secretary of State has written to the Work and Pensions Committee to apologise that the response to their call for DB reform due in May has been delayed

Let’s hope that whatever Reeves means by “some of the biggest reforms to pensions in a generation” will mean more than just the unblocking of the consolidation pipes.



Underwhelming

While big is beautiful and scale in pensions management important , none of this is exactly a rabbit out of the hat.

The reforms that matter to pensions are around the creation of pensions , not just pension funds. Angela Rayner may argue that

 “This is about harnessing the untapped potential of the pensions belonging to millions of people.”

But in reality the benefits of better investment in LGPS will feed through to the UK economy and lower council tax bills rather than improving member benefits. Master Trusts may in time increase performance but as Corporate Adviser points out, size does not correlate to better short-term performance

The harsh reality is that the reforms flagged so far are going to give consumers no prospect of bigger pensions or (in the short to medium term) bigger pots. For the Mansion House Reforms (2.0) to have any popular impact , the Government needs to show how these reforms lead to better pensions.

We are told that ~Interim Report of the Pensions Investment Review will be published today -to coincide with the Mansion House speech.

It won’t make for good reading for the mass ranks of asset and fund managers whose business models  depend on the LGPS. Consolidation will not be exclusive to the buy-side.


Conclusions

The announcements tonight look like no more than fixing consolidation constipation. There is no mention in any of the reports of using the VFM framework to do this. Instead the consultation on DC mastertrusts will focus on mandating that schemes get to scale and if they cannot show a plan to do so, will be required to consolidate. As for single employer schemes. the Government appears to have given up on getting them to give up. It will be interesting what (if any) plans Government has for GPPs (the FT has a glancing reference).

But there is nothing here that suggests that £80bn will flow into the British economy. This is pure speculation and without mandation (which is being ruled out) the best can be expected is that the LGPS pools and larger master trusts will be subject to a higher degree of coercion. I must say, one has to wonder “who from” since neither the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG), or TPR appear particularly expert in encouraging  private market investing.

Meanwhile the populist agenda for pensions continues to be ignored. The pensions dashboard s are suffering further neglect and are  now down  to a single dashboard, there is no progress on key initiatives on “decumulation” of DC funds and the much-touted work on CDC seems to be in a lay-by.

The Mansion House Reforms are now about forcing  the square peg of our pension system into the round hole of the Canadian and Australian ones. That is hardly the biggest pension reform of a generation.

Exit mobile version