Nico and I come at this subject from different angles. I was at Investment Solutions before it became Mobius Life and have spent more time than I should admit to with Adrian Swales – thinking about insured and non-insured solutions.
Nico’s views are public and well known. I have published a paper of his on my blog and have had some pushback on it – though I am not endorsing by publishing.
DC funds use insured platforms but DB funds used insured LDI solutions so there is no certainty of happy outcomes from insurance. Do life platforms add anything but convenience for the funders of workplace pensions?
Can Life funds and platforms really manage liquidity and what about the problems with valuations that follow a run on a fund?
Days after Schroders announce the launch of the first LTAF, what future does this new permitted-links buster have?
And what’s wrong with the Investment Trust as a means to access high quality illiquid assets without the fuss of a fund at all?
What do you think? Most people don’t know enough to have a view and I think this discussion could be really interesting.
If you have any questions you’d like me to put to Nico, send them in to AgeWage.com
For many the only question for Tuesday 14th March is whether State Man can beat Constitution Hill in the Champion Hurdle, but that’s not till 3pm
By way of a distraction you can log on to http://www.pensionplaypen.com and book your place via the events tab
I’d strongly advise you read Nico’s paper on this – which you can find here.